Open Science Initiative's Global Survey of Researchers
What Do Researchers Think About Open Access and Open Data Policies?
Executive Summary
Research is a profession, subject to the same types of incentives and pressures as any other profession. It should therefore come as no surprise that what researchers want most from research communication reforms are solutions that prioritize their individual career needs. These needs include paying less for publishing, having the freedom to publish where they choose (because choosing the best available journal is important for recognition and advancement), ensuring that the work they conduct and publish is of high quality, collaborating more effectively with their peers, being able to read other research work more easily, and having their institutions better support them. Our current global research communication reform efforts, such as open access (OA) and open science, have yet to effectively address these concerns, focusing instead on implementing policies like replacing the subscription model and requiring CC-BY licensing.
The Open Scholarship Initiative (OSI) conducted two global surveys of researchers in the spring and summer of 2022 to determine how this audience felt about open access policies. While the number of researchers who participated in these surveys was too small to reach any statistically significant conclusions, the responses we received were consistent with previous researcher surveys and suggest that most researchers are not being adequately served by OA policies and that these policies should focus instead on higher research communication priorities. More research is recommended.
ICYMI: https://t.co/KLWW9XCLE6
— Jill ONeill (@jillmwo) April 20, 2023
Proceedings of the Open Scholarship Initiative are published collaboratively by the Science Communication Institute and Mason Publishing, a division of the George Mason University Libraries.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13021/osi2023.3552